When you’re searching for a high-quality Bluetooth speaker, Marshall Stanmore III Vs Marshall Woburn III stand out for their impeccable sound, classic design, and versatile features. These speakers, inspired by Marshall’s iconic amplifier look, are popular among audiophiles and casual listeners alike. But which one should you choose? Let’s dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Introduction to Marshall Stanmore III and Woburn III
Both the Marshall Stanmore III vs Marshall Woburn III are premium Bluetooth speakers designed for music enthusiasts who prioritize sound quality and aesthetic appeal. With Marshall’s signature retro design and robust audio performance, these models offer distinct differences in terms of power, size, and unique features. Below is a detailed breakdown of what sets these two models apart.
Key Features of Marshall Stanmore III
- Power Output: 80 watts RMS
- Frequency Response: 45Hz – 20kHz
- Dimensions: 13.8″ (W) x 8.06″ (H) x 8.44″ (D)
- Weight: 9.37 lbs
- Bluetooth Version: 5.2
- Connections: 3.5mm aux input, RCA input
- Driver Configuration: Two 0.75″ dome tweeters and a 5″ woofer
- Special Features: Dynamic loudness for balanced sound at all volume levels; dual-device Bluetooth pairing
The Stanmore III is perfect for medium-sized rooms or personal use, offering balanced and clear audio without overwhelming the space. It provides impressive audio quality in a relatively compact design, making it a versatile speaker for home settings.
Key Features of Marshall Woburn III
- Power Output: 150 watts RMS
- Frequency Response: 35Hz – 20kHz
- Dimensions: 15.75″ (W) x 12.5″ (H) x 9″ (D)
- Weight: 16.42 lbs
- Bluetooth Version: 5.2
- Connections: 3.5mm aux input, RCA input, HDMI ARC for TV connectivity
- Driver Configuration: Two 0.75″ dome tweeters, two 2″ cone midrange drivers, and a 6″ woofer
- Special Features: Night mode for softer sound output when connected via HDMI ARC, placement compensation to optimize sound based on the speaker’s location in the room
With its larger design and higher power output, the Woburn III is ideal for filling larger rooms or entertaining in spacious environments. Its three-way driver system ensures a richer sound experience with clearer separation between frequencies.
Marshall Stanmore III Vs Marshall Woburn III: Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Marshall Stanmore III | Marshall Woburn III |
|---|---|---|
| Power Output (RMS) | 80 watts | 150 watts |
| Driver Configuration | Two tweeters + 5″ woofer | Two tweeters + two midrange + 6″ woofer |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz – 20kHz | 35Hz – 20kHz |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| HDMI ARC | No | Yes |
| Dimensions (W x H x D) | 13.8″ x 8.06″ x 8.44″ | 15.75″ x 12.5″ x 9″ |
| Weight | 9.37 lbs | 16.42 lbs |
| Tweeter Size | 0.75″ | 0.75″ |
| Midrange Size | — | 2″ |
| Woofer Size | 5″ | 6″ |
| Connections | 3.5mm aux input, RCA input | 3.5mm aux input, RCA input, HDMI ARC |
| Special Features | Dynamic loudness, dual-device pairing | Night mode, placement compensation |
In-Depth Comparison
1. Power and Sound Output
The most significant difference between the Stanmore III and the Woburn III lies in their power output. The Stanmore III offers 80 watts RMS, which is ideal for most indoor settings and personal listening experiences. In contrast, the Woburn III delivers 150 watts RMS, making it better suited for larger spaces and more immersive audio experiences. The additional power and the three-way driver configuration of the Woburn result in richer bass and crisper highs, giving it an edge when it comes to sound performance.
2. Size and Portability
While both models feature Marshall’s classic design, the Woburn III is noticeably larger and heavier than the Stanmore III. If you’re short on space or prefer something more portable, the Stanmore III would be the better option. However, if you’re looking for a speaker that can fill a large room with sound or be a focal point in a spacious living area, the Woburn III excels in this regard.
3. Connectivity
Both models support Bluetooth 5.2, ensuring reliable and high-quality wireless audio streaming. They also feature 3.5mm aux and RCA inputs for wired connections. The Woburn III, however, offers an additional HDMI ARC input, making it a great option if you want to use it as a soundbar for your TV. This feature allows the Woburn to be integrated into a home theater setup, providing enhanced sound for movies and TV shows.
4. Unique Features
Both speakers come with unique audio-enhancing features. The Stanmore III features dynamic loudness, which automatically adjusts the tonal balance to ensure that all frequencies remain clear even at lower volumes. The Woburn III, on the other hand, has night mode (for softer volume at night) and placement compensation, which optimizes sound quality based on where the speaker is positioned in the room.
Which One Should You Buy?
Go for the Marshall Stanmore III if:
- You need a high-quality Bluetooth speaker for a medium-sized room or personal use.
- Portability or space-saving is a priority.
- You’re looking for excellent sound at a more affordable price point ($329.99).
The Stanmore III offers a great balance between power, portability, and audio performance. It’s the perfect choice for most home environments.
Go for the Marshall Woburn III if:
- You need a speaker that can fill a large space with sound or be the centerpiece of a home entertainment system.
- You want the option to connect the speaker to your TV via HDMI ARC.
- You’re looking for more immersive and powerful sound for larger gatherings or parties.
The Woburn III, priced at $529.99, is a powerhouse for those who want nothing less than the best in sound quality and versatility.
Conclusion
Both the Marshall Stanmore III vs Marshall Woburn III are top-tier Bluetooth speakers that deliver excellent sound performance. If you’re looking for a versatile speaker for personal or small room use, the Stanmore III is more than capable. However, if you’re seeking a larger speaker with more power and enhanced features for larger spaces, the Woburn III will not disappoint.
